You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
「クレオゾート」療法ニヨリテ治癒セル急性腐敗性氣管枝炎
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon Naika Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine, January 1915
|
| DOI | 10.2169/naika.3.350 |
| Authors |
小池 重 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Naika Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
#74
of 725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71
of 2,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Naika Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 725 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them