↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of Sampling Stability in Ecological Applications of Discriminant Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology, August 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of Sampling Stability in Ecological Applications of Discriminant Analysis
Published in
Ecology, August 1988
DOI 10.2307/1941283
Authors

Byron K. Williams, Kimberly Titus

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 4%
Argentina 2 2%
United Arab Emirates 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 74 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 27%
Professor 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 56%
Environmental Science 17 21%
Engineering 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#8,308,887
of 24,858,211 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#3,412
of 6,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,675
of 12,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,858,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.