↓ Skip to main content

The 2020 update of the CEAP classification system and reporting standards

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 942)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
27 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
guideline
11 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
705 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The 2020 update of the CEAP classification system and reporting standards
Published in
Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders, February 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.12.075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fedor Lurie, Marc Passman, Mark Meisner, Michael Dalsing, Elna Masuda, Harold Welch, Ruth L Bush, John Blebea, Patrick H Carpentier, Marianne De Maeseneer, Anthony Gasparis, Nicos Labropoulos, William A Marston, Joseph Rafetto, Fabricio Santiago, Cynthia Shortell, Jean Francois Uhl, Tomasz Urbanek, André van Rij, Bo Eklof, Peter Gloviczki, Robert Kistner, Peter Lawrence, Gregory Moneta, Frank Padberg, Michel Perrin, Thomas Wakefield

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 705 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 705 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 78 11%
Other 50 7%
Researcher 42 6%
Student > Master 36 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 5%
Other 121 17%
Unknown 343 49%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 218 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 7%
Unspecified 23 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 2%
Engineering 8 1%
Other 40 6%
Unknown 355 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2025.
All research outputs
#740,803
of 33,083,482 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders
#17
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,210
of 404,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,083,482 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.