↓ Skip to main content

Warm spring temperatures induce persistent season-long changes in shoot development in grapevines

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Botany, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Warm spring temperatures induce persistent season-long changes in shoot development in grapevines
Published in
Annals of Botany, May 2010
DOI 10.1093/aob/mcq091
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The influence of temperature on the timing of budbreak in woody perennials is well known, but its effect on subsequent shoot growth and architecture has received little attention because it is understood that growth is determined by current temperature. Seasonal shoot development of grapevines (Vitis vinifera) was evaluated following differences in temperature near budbreak while minimizing the effects of other microclimatic variables.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Chile 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 13%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 25 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 63%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Engineering 5 4%
Philosophy 1 <1%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#3,361
of 3,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,220
of 104,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.