Ebola survivors’ healthcare-seeking experiences and preferences of conventional, complementary and traditional medicine use: A qualitative exploratory study in Sierra Leone

Overview of attention for article published in Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, March 2020

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 4 news outlets

twitter: 1 X user

Readers on

mendeley: 65 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Ebola survivors’ healthcare-seeking experiences and preferences of conventional, complementary and traditional medicine use: A qualitative exploratory study in Sierra Leone
Published in	Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, March 2020
DOI	10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101127
Pubmed ID	32379665
Authors	Peter Bai James, Jon Wardle, Amie Steel, Jon Adams

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Australia	1	100%

Demographic breakdown

Type
Type	Count	As %
Scientists	1	100%

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Unknown	65	100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Unspecified	9	14%
Student > Master	7	11%
Student > Bachelor	6	9%
Student > Doctoral Student	5	8%
Researcher	4	6%
Other	8	12%
Unknown	26	40%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Nursing and Health Professions	10	15%
Unspecified	9	14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science	4	6%
Social Sciences	4	6%
Medicine and Dentistry	4	6%
Other	6	9%
Unknown	28	43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.

All research outputs

#1,519,918

of 32,532,789 outputs

Outputs from Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice

#149

of 1,206 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#29,695

of 402,249 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice

of 58 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 32,532,789 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 1,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.