You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global, Regional, and National Levels and Trends in Burden of Oral Conditions from 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease 2017 Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0022034520908533 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
GBD 2017 Oral Disorders Collaborators, E. Bernabe, W. Marcenes, C.R. Hernandez, J. Bailey, L.G. Abreu, V. Alipour, S. Amini, J. Arabloo, Z. Arefi, A. Arora, M.A. Ayanore, T.W. Bärnighausen, A. Bijani, D.Y. Cho, D.T. Chu, C.S. Crowe, G.T. Demoz, D.G. Demsie, Z.S. Dibaji Forooshani, M. Du, M. El Tantawi, F. Fischer, M.O. Folayan, N.D. Futran, Y.C.D. Geramo, A. Haj-Mirzaian, N. Hariyani, A. Hasanzadeh, S. Hassanipour, S.I. Hay, M.K. Hole, S. Hostiuc, M.D. Ilic, S.L. James, R. Kalhor, L. Kemmer, M. Keramati, Y.S. Khader, S. Kisa, A. Kisa, A. Koyanagi, R. Lalloo, Q. Le Nguyen, S.D. London, N.D. Manohar, B.B. Massenburg, M.R. Mathur, H.G. Meles, T. Mestrovic, A. Mohammadian-Hafshejani, R. Mohammadpourhodki, A.H. Mokdad, S.D. Morrison, J. Nazari, T.H. Nguyen, C.T. Nguyen, M.R. Nixon, T.O. Olagunju, K. Pakshir, M. Pathak, N. Rabiee, A. Rafiei, K. Ramezanzadeh, M.J. Rios-Blancas, E.M. Roro, S. Sabour, A.M. Samy, M. Sawhney, F. Schwendicke, F. Shaahmadi, M.A. Shaikh, C. Stein, M.R. Tovani-Palone, B.X. Tran, B. Unnikrishnan, G.T. Vu, A. Vukovic, T.S.S. Warouw, Z. Zaidi, Z.J. Zhang, N.J. Kassebaum |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pakistan | 1 | 13% |
| Chile | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 895 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 895 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 95 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 77 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 44 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 42 | 5% |
| Other | 141 | 16% |
| Unknown | 442 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 290 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 2% |
| Engineering | 9 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | <1% |
| Other | 73 | 8% |
| Unknown | 473 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,405,955
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine
#665
of 3,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,467
of 386,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine
#12
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.