↓ Skip to main content

Burn Injuries Benefit from Massage Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation, May 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 523)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
62 Google+ users
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Burn Injuries Benefit from Massage Therapy
Published in
Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation, May 1998
DOI 10.1097/00004630-199805000-00010
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Twenty-eight adult patients with burns were randomly assigned before debridement to either a massage therapy group or a standard treatment control group. State anxiety and cortisol levels decreased, and behavior ratings of state, activity, vocalizations, and anxiety improved after the massage therapy sessions on the first and last days of treatment. Longer-term effects were also significantly better for the massage therapy group including decreases in depression and anger, and decreased pain on the McGill Pain Questionnaire, Present Pain Intensity scale, and Visual Analogue Scale. Although the underlying mechanisms are not known, these data suggest that debridement sessions were less painful after the massage therapy sessions due to a reduction in anxiety, and that the clinical course was probably enhanced as the result of a reduction in pain, anger, and depression.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Librarian 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 20 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Psychology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 23 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2018.
All research outputs
#778,692
of 34,447,360 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation
#2
of 523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258
of 49,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,447,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 523 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them