↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
“Game on!” Teaching gamification principles for library instruction to health sciences information professionals using interactive, low-tech activities and design-thinking modalities
Published in
Journal of the Medical Library Association, October 2019
DOI 10.5195/jmla.2019.636
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 185 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 12%
Lecturer 13 7%
Librarian 12 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 91 49%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 14 8%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 4%
Computer Science 6 3%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 98 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#17,852,290
of 27,789,359 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Medical Library Association
#590
of 941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,389
of 367,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Medical Library Association
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,789,359 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.