↓ Skip to main content

Hybrid materials with an increased resistance to hard X-rays using fullerenes as radical sponges

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Synchrotron Radiation (International Union of Crystallography - IUCr), June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Hybrid materials with an increased resistance to hard X-rays using fullerenes as radical sponges
Published in
Journal of Synchrotron Radiation (International Union of Crystallography - IUCr), June 2012
DOI 10.1107/s0909049512012848
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The protection of organic and hybrid organic-inorganic materials from X-ray damage is a fundamental technological issue for broadening the range of applications of these materials. In the present article it is shown that doping hybrid films with fullerenes C(60) gives a significant reduction of damage upon exposure to hard X-rays generated by a synchrotron source. At low X-ray dose the fullerene molecules act as `radical scavengers', considerably reducing the degradation of organic species triggered by radical formation. At higher doses the gradual hydroxylation of the fullerenes converts C(60) into fullerol and a bleaching of the radical sinking properties is observed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 29%
Professor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 29%
Chemistry 2 29%
Chemical Engineering 1 14%
Materials Science 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2012.
All research outputs
#24,894,163
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Synchrotron Radiation (International Union of Crystallography - IUCr)
#1,237
of 2,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,011
of 216,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Synchrotron Radiation (International Union of Crystallography - IUCr)
#9
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.