↓ Skip to main content

Rare Histological Variants of Prostate Adenocarcinoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Urology, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
44 X users

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rare Histological Variants of Prostate Adenocarcinoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis.
Published in
The Journal of Urology, March 2020
DOI 10.1097/ju.0000000000001011
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The American Joint Committee on Cancer recognizes six rare histological variants of prostate adenocarcinoma. Our aim was to describe the contemporary presentation and overall survival of these rare variants. We examined 1345618 patients who were diagnosed with prostate adenocarcinoma, between 2004 and 2015, within the National Cancer Database. We focused on the following variants: mucinous, ductal, signet ring cell, adenosquamous, sarcomatoid, and neuroendocrine. Characteristics at presentation for each variant were compared with nonvariant prostate adenocarcinoma. Cox regression was used to study the impact of histological variant on overall mortality. Few (0.38%) patients presented with rare-variant prostate adenocarcinoma. All variants had higher clinical tumor stage at presentation than nonvariant (all p<0.001). Metastatic disease was most common with neuroendocrine (62.9%), followed by sarcomatoid (33.3%), adenosquamous (31.1%), signet ring cell (10.3%), and ductal (9.8%), compared to 4.2% in nonvariant (all p<0.001). Metastatic disease in mucinous (3.3%) was similar to nonvariant (p=0.2). Estimated 10-year overall survival was highest in mucinous (78.0%), followed by nonvariant (71.1%), signet ring cell (56.8%), ductal (56.3%), adenosquamous (20.5%), sarcomatoid (14.6%) and neuroendocrine (9.1%). At multivariable analysis, mortality was higher in ductal (HR: 1.38; p<0.001), signet ring cell (HR: 1.53; p<0.01), neuroendocrine (HR: 5.72; p<0.001), sarcomatoid (HR: 5.81; p<0.001), and adenosquamous (HR: 9.34; p<0.001), as compared to nonvariant. Neuroendocrine, adenosquamous, sarcomatoid, signet ring cell, and ductal variants more commonly present with metastases. All variants present with higher local stage than nonvariant. Neuroendocrine is associated with the worst, and mucinous with the best overall survival.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Other 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 46%
Computer Science 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 11 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,817,930
of 34,528,520 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#1,052
of 21,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,402
of 418,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#34
of 358 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,528,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 358 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.