↓ Skip to main content

On the electronic structure of giant polyoxometalates: Mo 132 vs. W 72 Mo 60

Overview of attention for article published in Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
On the electronic structure of giant polyoxometalates: Mo 132 vs. W 72 Mo 60
Published in
Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, June 2012
DOI 10.1039/c2dt30737e
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The molecular and electronic structure of the spherical Keplerates [{(Mo(VI))Mo(VI)(5)O(21)}(12)(Mo(V)(2)O(4))(30)](12-) (Mo(132)) and [{(W(VI))W(VI)(5)O(21)}(12)(Mo(V)(2)O(4))(30)](12-) (W(72)Mo(60)) has been determined, for the first time, using first-principles density functional theory (DFT) based methods including solvent effects. Computed geometric parameters are in very good agreement with X-ray data, whereas the electronic structure reveals the archetypal nature of polyoxometalates.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Spain 1 7%
Chile 1 7%
Unknown 12 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Researcher 3 20%
Librarian 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Decision Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2012.
All research outputs
#5,910,548
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
#1,199
of 24,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,267
of 212,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
#14
of 378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,747 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.