↓ Skip to main content

Proposed MHRA changes to UK children's paracetamol dosing recommendations: modelling study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Proposed MHRA changes to UK children's paracetamol dosing recommendations: modelling study
Published in
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, May 2012
DOI 10.1258/jrsm.2012.110330
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Paracetamol is the most commonly administered medicine to children. A recent study highlighted the risk of overdose of paracetamol using British National Formulary for Children (BNFC) age-based dosing guidelines. This current study assesses the safety of changes to the UK paracetamol product dosing system proposed by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Authority (MHRA) which include a larger number of narrower age bands and a single dose per age band.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Researcher 5 19%
Other 3 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Unknown 11 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2012.
All research outputs
#14,146,599
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#2,062
of 2,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,257
of 164,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
#13
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.