↓ Skip to main content

Comment on "Phytoplankton Calcification in a High-CO2 World"

Overview of attention for article published in Science, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comment on "Phytoplankton Calcification in a High-CO2 World"
Published in
Science, December 2008
DOI 10.1126/science.1161096
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Iglesias-Rodriguez et al. (Research Articles, 18 April 2008, p. 336) reported that the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi doubles its organic matter production and calcification in response to high carbon dioxide partial pressures, contrary to previous laboratory and field studies. We argue that shortcomings in their experimental protocol compromise the interpretation of their data and the resulting conclusions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Canada 4 2%
United States 3 1%
Germany 3 1%
Mexico 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 196 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 62 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 19%
Student > Master 25 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 7%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Other 41 18%
Unknown 23 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 35%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 56 25%
Environmental Science 47 21%
Chemistry 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 <1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 26 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,650,911
of 31,936,881 outputs
Outputs from Science
#41,793
of 91,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,844
of 226,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#180
of 373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,936,881 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.