↓ Skip to main content

Random walks and the Hagedorn transition

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of High Energy Physics, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Random walks and the Hagedorn transition
Published in
Journal of High Energy Physics, July 2006
DOI 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/07/031
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 40%
Physics and Astronomy 2 40%
Computer Science 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2016.
All research outputs
#19,561,605
of 31,849,655 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#4,705
of 26,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,032
of 119,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#17
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,849,655 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,479 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.