You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
重複投薬・相互作用等防止加算関連業務の分析と経済効果
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Iryo Yakugaku (Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences), December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.5649/jjphcs.44.599 |
| Authors |
Kanae Ajisawa, Manabu Suzuki, Yui Hayashi, Junko Kai, Atsushi Kobayashi, Michiko Obara, Nobuhiro Namaki, Maaya Koda, Natsumi Kanaji, Hideki Hayashi, Tomohiro Tanase, Teruo Tsuchida, Tadashi Sugiyama |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,887,818
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Iryo Yakugaku (Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences)
#110
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,437
of 445,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Iryo Yakugaku (Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences)
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.