↓ Skip to main content

Data sharing, management, use, and reuse: Practices and perceptions of scientists worldwide

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
38 X users

Readers on

mendeley
343 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Data sharing, management, use, and reuse: Practices and perceptions of scientists worldwide
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2020
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0229003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 343 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 34 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 9%
Student > Master 26 8%
Researcher 26 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 3%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 162 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 39 11%
Computer Science 30 9%
Arts and Humanities 19 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 2%
Other 61 18%
Unknown 171 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2025.
All research outputs
#791,152
of 32,606,541 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#9,679
of 217,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,859
of 407,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#157
of 2,761 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,606,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,761 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.