Prevalence of Human Papillomavirus Types in Invasive Vulvar Cancers and Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia 3 in the United States Before Vaccine Introduction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, October 2012

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy: 1 policy source
twitter: 8 X users

reddit: 1 Redditor
guideline: 2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley: 45 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Prevalence of Human Papillomavirus Types in Invasive Vulvar Cancers and Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia 3 in the United States Before Vaccine Introduction
Published in	Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, October 2012
DOI	10.1097/lgt.0b013e3182472947
Pubmed ID	22652576
Authors	Julia W. Gargano, Edward J. Wilkinson, Elizabeth R. Unger, Martin Steinau, Meg Watson, Youjie Huang, Glenn Copeland, Wendy Cozen, Marc T. Goodman, Claudia Hopenhayn, Charles F. Lynch, Brenda Y. Hernandez, Edward S. Peters, Maria Sibug Saber, Christopher W. Lyu, Lauren A. Sands, Mona Saraiya
Abstract	The study aimed to determine the baseline prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) types in invasive vulvar cancer (IVC) and vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (VIN 3) cases using data from 7 US cancer registries.

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Activity

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
United States	4	50%
Ecuador	1	13%
Unknown	3	38%

Demographic breakdown

Type
Type	Count	As %
Members of the public	7	88%
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)	1	13%

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
United States	2	4%
Spain	1	2%
Unknown	42	93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Researcher	9	20%
Student > Ph. D. Student	8	18%
Other	4	9%
Student > Doctoral Student	3	7%
Student > Master	3	7%
Other	8	18%
Unknown	10	22%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	23	51%
Social Sciences	4	9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology	3	7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	2	4%
Nursing and Health Professions	1	2%
Other	1	2%
Unknown	11	24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2026.

All research outputs

#3,008,861

of 32,692,245 outputs

Outputs from Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

#67

of 746 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#18,903

of 219,535 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

of 13 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 32,692,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.