You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predictive value of blood eosinophils and exhaled nitric oxide in adults with mild asthma: a prespecified subgroup analysis of an open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30053-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ian D Pavord, Mark Holliday, Helen K Reddel, Irene Braithwaite, Stefan Ebmeier, Robert J Hancox, Tim Harrison, Claire Houghton, Karen Oldfield, Alberto Papi, Mathew Williams, Mark Weatherall, Richard Beasley, Novel START Study Team, Andrew Corin, Colin Helm, Bhuwan Poudel, Davitt Sheahan, Pamela Sheahan, Miriam Bennett, Caterina Chang, Hollie Ellis, Bob Hancox, Sandra Hopping, Christine Tuffery, James Michael Ramsahai, Jodie Simpson, Peter Wark, Maria Aliani, Maddalena Genco, Alberto Capozzolo, Mauro Carone, Elisa Maini, Jenny Mancin, Antonio Meriggi, Luca Perfetti, Francesca Cherubino, Antonio Spanevello, Dina Visca, Elisabetta Zampogna, Christina Baggott, Richard Beasley, Irene Braithwaite, Allie Eathorne, Stefan Ebmeier, James Fingleton, Jo Hardy, Mark Holliday, Claire Houghton, Karen Oldfield, Janine Pilcher, Donah Sabbagh, Alex Semprini, Mathew Williams, Tim Harrison, Karen Shaw, Summer Mackisack, Barney Montgomery, Karen Autridge, Joanna Joseph, Stella Moon, Dean Quinn, Dean Millar-Coote, Jim Reid, Federico Bellini, Martina Marchi, Luca Morandi, Marianna Padovani, Alberto Papi, Daniela Scalet, Katie Borg, Clare Connolly, Anna Gittins, Gareth Hynes, Helen Jeffers, Ian Pavord, Rahul Shrimanker, Gloria Foxley, Elyse Guevara-Rattray, Stephen Milne, Helen Reddel, Brett Toelle |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 17% |
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Panama | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 67% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 47 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 51 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2026.
All research outputs
#1,318,788
of 34,619,351 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#801
of 3,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,111
of 419,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#38
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,619,351 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 74.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.