↓ Skip to main content

早期胃癌に対する腹腔鏡下胃切除後の感染性合併症危険因子としての 骨格筋脂肪化の意義

Overview of attention for article published in The Japanese Journal of SURGICAL METABOLISM and NUTRITION, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 129)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
早期胃癌に対する腹腔鏡下胃切除後の感染性合併症危険因子としての 骨格筋脂肪化の意義
Published in
The Japanese Journal of SURGICAL METABOLISM and NUTRITION, January 2020
DOI 10.11638/jssmn.54.1_42
Authors

内田 恒之, 関根 隆一, 松尾 憲一, 木川 岳, 梅本 岳宏, 喜島 一博, 原田 芳邦, 若林 哲司, 高橋 裕季, 塩澤 敏光, 小山 英之, 柴田 栞里, 田中 邦哉

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2022.
All research outputs
#15,803,463
of 25,013,816 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of SURGICAL METABOLISM and NUTRITION
#33
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,844
of 470,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of SURGICAL METABOLISM and NUTRITION
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,013,816 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.