↓ Skip to main content

The Ruins of the Pond-Garden that once existed in the Ryoanji Temple and the Age when its Rvck-Garben was built

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architects, January 1957
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Ruins of the Pond-Garden that once existed in the Ryoanji Temple and the Age when its Rvck-Garben was built
Published in
Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architects, January 1957
DOI 10.5632/jila1934.21.4_1
Authors

Kinsaku NAKANE

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2022.
All research outputs
#15,516,483
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architects
#86
of 107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,442
of 6,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architects
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 107 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them