You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Testing the interactive effects of flooding and salinity on tidal marsh plant productivity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aquatic Botany, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.aquabot.2020.103231 |
| Authors |
Kevin J. Buffington, Arianna C. Goodman, Chase M. Freeman, Karen M. Thorne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 9 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,719,491
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Botany
#171
of 808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,347
of 410,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Botany
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 808 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.