↓ Skip to main content

Designing coopetition for radical innovation: An experimental study of managers' preferences for developing self-driving electric cars

Overview of attention for article published in Technological Forecasting and Social Change, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Designing coopetition for radical innovation: An experimental study of managers' preferences for developing self-driving electric cars
Published in
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, June 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119992
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 181 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Student > Master 11 6%
Lecturer 10 6%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 72 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 64 35%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Engineering 11 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 4%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 74 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#22,698,769
of 27,789,879 outputs
Outputs from Technological Forecasting and Social Change
#2,247
of 2,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#338,854
of 438,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Technological Forecasting and Social Change
#41
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,789,879 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.