↓ Skip to main content

A model‐data intercomparison of CO2 exchange across North America: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geophysical Research, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A model‐data intercomparison of CO2 exchange across North America: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis
Published in
Journal of Geophysical Research, December 2010
DOI 10.1029/2009jg001229
Authors

Christopher R. Schwalm, Christopher A. Williams, Kevin Schaefer, Ryan Anderson, M. Altaf Arain, Ian Baker, Alan Barr, T. Andrew Black, Guangsheng Chen, Jing Ming Chen, Philippe Ciais, Kenneth J. Davis, Ankur Desai, Michael Dietze, Danilo Dragoni, Marc L. Fischer, Lawrence B. Flanagan, Robert Grant, Lianhong Gu, David Hollinger, R. César Izaurralde, Chris Kucharik, Peter Lafleur, Beverly E. Law, Longhui Li, Zhengpeng Li, Shuguang Liu, Erandathie Lokupitiya, Yiqi Luo, Siyan Ma, Hank Margolis, Roser Matamala, Harry McCaughey, Russell K. Monson, Walter C. Oechel, Changhui Peng, Benjamin Poulter, David T. Price, Dan M. Riciutto, William Riley, Alok Kumar Sahoo, Michael Sprintsin, Jianfeng Sun, Hanqin Tian, Christina Tonitto, Hans Verbeeck, Shashi B. Verma

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Mexico 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 244 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 77 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 24%
Professor 21 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 7%
Student > Master 12 5%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 31 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 92 36%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 67 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 11%
Engineering 4 2%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 50 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#4,857
of 15,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,641
of 197,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#92
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.