↓ Skip to main content

Conservation of complex knotting and slipknotting patterns in proteins

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Conservation of complex knotting and slipknotting patterns in proteins
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2012
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1205918109
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

While analyzing all available protein structures for the presence of knots and slipknots, we detected a strict conservation of complex knotting patterns within and between several protein families despite their large sequence divergence. Because protein folding pathways leading to knotted native protein structures are slower and less efficient than those leading to unknotted proteins with similar size and sequence, the strict conservation of the knotting patterns indicates an important physiological role of knots and slipknots in these proteins. Although little is known about the functional role of knots, recent studies have demonstrated a protein-stabilizing ability of knots and slipknots. Some of the conserved knotting patterns occur in proteins forming transmembrane channels where the slipknot loop seems to strap together the transmembrane helices forming the channel.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Germany 2 1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 160 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 30%
Researcher 32 18%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 22 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 51 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 14%
Physics and Astronomy 20 12%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 24 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,664,397
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#21,799
of 118,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,125
of 218,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#156
of 970 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 970 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.