↓ Skip to main content

メンデルを継ぐ者?――J・P・ロッツィの交雑に基づく進化論

Overview of attention for article published in The Japanese Journal of the History of Biology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
メンデルを継ぐ者?――J・P・ロッツィの交雑に基づく進化論
Published in
The Japanese Journal of the History of Biology, November 2017
DOI 10.24708/seibutsugakushi.96.0_76
Authors

中尾 暁

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#15,179,141
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of the History of Biology
#13
of 23 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,646
of 340,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of the History of Biology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.