↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of Recombination: Lessons from E. coli

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mechanisms of Recombination: Lessons from E. coli
Published in
Critical Reviews in Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, January 2009
DOI 10.1080/10409230802485358
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Slovenia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 158 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 33%
Researcher 31 18%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Master 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 24 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 28 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2012.
All research outputs
#7,581,873
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
#184
of 531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,958
of 249,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.