↓ Skip to main content

Meta-Selective CAr–H Nitration of Arenes through a Ru3(CO)12-Catalyzed Ortho-Metalation Strategy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Chemical Society, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
8 patents

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Meta-Selective CAr–H Nitration of Arenes through a Ru3(CO)12-Catalyzed Ortho-Metalation Strategy
Published in
Journal of the American Chemical Society, May 2016
DOI 10.1021/jacs.6b03402
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The first example of transition metal-catalyzed meta-selective CAr-H nitration of arenes is described. By using Ru3(CO)12 as the catalyst and Cu(NO3)2.3H2O as the nitro source, a wide spectrum of arenes bearing diversified N-heterocycles or oximido as the directing groups were nitrated with meta-selectivity exclusively and no ortho-nitration was detected. Mechanism studies have demonstrated the formation of a new 18e- octahedral ruthenium species as a key CAr-H metalation intermediate, which may be responsible for the subsequent meta-selective electrophilic aromatic substitution (SEAr). Moreover, this approach provides a fast-track strategy for atom/step economical synthesis of many useful pharmaceutical molecules.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 127 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 25%
Student > Master 18 14%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Professor 7 5%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 24 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 86 67%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 <1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 31 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2024.
All research outputs
#1,880,500
of 30,202,275 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#2,922
of 76,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,549
of 317,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#27
of 450 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,202,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 450 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.