↓ Skip to main content

gSeaGen: The KM3NeT GENIE-based code for neutrino telescopes

Overview of attention for article published in Computer Physics Communications, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
gSeaGen: The KM3NeT GENIE-based code for neutrino telescopes
Published in
Computer Physics Communications, November 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107477
Authors

S. Aiello, A. Albert, S. Alves Garre, Z. Aly, F. Ameli, M. Andre, G. Androulakis, M. Anghinolfi, M. Anguita, G. Anton, M. Ardid, J. Aublin, C. Bagatelas, G. Barbarino, B. Baret, S. Basegmez du Pree, M. Bendahman, E. Berbee, A.M. van den Berg, V. Bertin, S. Biagi, A. Biagioni, M. Bissinger, M. Boettcher, J. Boumaaza, M. Bouta, M. Bouwhuis, C. Bozza, H. Brânzaş, M. Bruchner, R. Bruijn, J. Brunner, E. Buis, R. Buompane, J. Busto, D. Calvo, A. Capone, V. Carretero, P. Castaldi, S. Celli, M. Chabab, N. Chau, A. Chen, S. Cherubini, V. Chiarella, T. Chiarusi, M. Circella, R. Cocimano, J.A.B. Coelho, A. Coleiro, M. Colomer Molla, R. Coniglione, I. Corredoira, P. Coyle, A. Creusot, G. Cuttone, A. D’Onofrio, R. Dallier, M. De Palma, I. Di Palma, A.F. Díaz, D. Diego-Tortosa, C. Distefano, A. Domi, R. Donà, C. Donzaud, D. Dornic, M. Dörr, D. Drouhin, M. Durocher, T. Eberl, D. van Eijk, I. El Bojaddaini, D. Elsaesser, A. Enzenhöfer, V. Espinosa Roselló, P. Fermani, G. Ferrara, M.D. Filipović, F. Filippini, A. Franco, L.A. Fusco, O. Gabella, T. Gal, A. Garcia Soto, F. Garufi, Y. Gatelet, N. Geißelbrecht, L. Gialanella, E. Giorgio, S.R. Gozzini, R. Gracia, K. Graf, D. Grasso, G. Grella, D. Guderian, C. Guidi, S. Hallmann, H. Hamdaoui, H. van Haren, A. Heijboer, A. Hekalo, J.J. Hernández-Rey, J. Hofestädt, F. Huang, W. Idrissi Ibnsalih, G. Illuminati, C.W. James, M. de Jong, P. de Jong, B.J. Jung, M. Kadler, P. Kalaczyński, O. Kalekin, U.F. Katz, N.R. Khan Chowdhury, F. van der Knaap, E.N. Koffeman, P. Kooijman, A. Kouchner, M. Kreter, V. Kulikovskiy, R. Lahmann, G. Larosa, R. Le Breton, O. Leonardi, F. Leone, E. Leonora, G. Levi, M. Lincetto, M. Lindsey Clark, T. Lipreau, A. Lonardo, F. Longhitano, D. Lopez-Coto, L. Maderer, J. Mańczak, K. Mannheim, A. Margiotta, A. Marinelli, C. Markou, L. Martin, J.A. Martínez-Mora, A. Martini, F. Marzaioli, S. Mastroianni, S. Mazzou, K.W. Melis, G. Miele, P. Migliozzi, E. Migneco, P. Mijakowski, L.S. Miranda, Z. Modebadze, C.M. Mollo, M. Morganti, M. Moser, A. Moussa, R. Muller, M. Musumeci, L. Nauta, S. Navas, C.A. Nicolau, B. Ó Fearraigh, M. Organokov, A. Orlando, G. Papalashvili, R. Papaleo, C. Pastore, A.M. Paun, G.E. Păvălaş, C. Pellegrino, M. Perrin-Terrin, P. Piattelli, C. Pieterse, K. Pikounis, O. Pisanti, C. Poirè, V. Popa, M. Post, T. Pradier, G. Pühlhofer, S. Pulvirenti, L. Quinn, O. Rabyang, F. Raffaelli, N. Randazzo, A. Rapicavoli, S. Razzaque, D. Real, S. Reck, J. Reubelt, G. Riccobene, M. Richer, S. Rivoire, A. Rovelli, F. Salesa Greus, D.F.E. Samtleben, A. Sánchez Losa, M. Sanguineti, A. Santangelo, D. Santonocito, P. Sapienza, J. Schnabel, V. Sciacca, J. Seneca, I. Sgura, R. Shanidze, A. Sharma, F. Simeone, A. Sinopoulou, B. Spisso, M. Spurio, D. Stavropoulos, J. Steijger, S.M. Stellacci, M. Taiuti, Y. Tayalati, E. Tenllado, T. Thakore, S. Tingay, E. Tzamariudaki, D. Tzanetatos, V. Van Elewyck, G. Vannoye, G. Vasileiadis, F. Versari, S. Viola, D. Vivolo, G. de Wasseige, J. Wilms, R. Wojaczyński, E. de Wolf, D. Zaborov, S. Zavatarelli, A. Zegarelli, J.D. Zornoza, J. Zúñiga, N. Zywucka

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 8 33%
Environmental Science 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,799,713
of 29,353,077 outputs
Outputs from Computer Physics Communications
#154
of 2,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,258
of 450,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Physics Communications
#8
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,353,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,270 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.