You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sensitivity of the DARWIN observatory to the neutrinoless double beta decay of 136Xe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The European Physical Journal C, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8196-z |
| Authors |
F. Agostini, S. E. M. Ahmed Maouloud, L. Althueser, F. Amaro, B. Antunovic, E. Aprile, L. Baudis, D. Baur, Y. Biondi, A. Bismark, P. A. Breur, A. Brown, G. Bruno, R. Budnik, C. Capelli, J. Cardoso, D. Cichon, M. Clark, A. P. Colijn, J. J. Cuenca-García, J. P. Cussonneau, M. P. Decowski, A. Depoian, J. Dierle, P. Di Gangi, A. Di Giovanni, S. Diglio, J. M. F. dos Santos, G. Drexlin, K. Eitel, R. Engel, A. D. Ferella, H. Fischer, M. Galloway, F. Gao, F. Girard, F. Glück, L. Grandi, R. Größle, R. Gumbsheimer, S. Hansmann-Menzemer, F. Jörg, G. Khundzakishvili, A. Kopec, F. Kuger, L. M. Krauss, H. Landsman, R. F. Lang, S. Lindemann, M. Lindner, J. A. M. Lopes, A. Loya Villalpando, C. Macolino, A. Manfredini, T. Marrodán Undagoitia, J. Masbou, E. Masson, P. Meinhardt, S. Milutinovic, A. Molinario, C. M. B. Monteiro, M. Murra, U. G. Oberlack, M. Pandurovic, R. Peres, J. Pienaar, M. Pierre, V. Pizzella, J. Qin, D. Ramírez García, S. Reichard, N. Rupp, P. Sanchez-Lucas, G. Sartorelli, D. Schulte, M. Schumann, L. Scotto Lavina, M. Selvi, M. Silva, H. Simgen, M. Steidl, A. Terliuk, C. Therreau, D. Thers, K. Thieme, R. Trotta, C. D. Tunnell, K. Valerius, G. Volta, D. Vorkapic, C. Weinheimer, C. Wittweg, J. Wolf, J. P. Zopounidis, K. Zuber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Tuvalu | 1 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 15 | 52% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 34% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 20 | 69% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,267,700
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal C
#77
of 9,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,885
of 426,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal C
#4
of 311 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,148 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 311 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.