↓ Skip to main content

Distribution of Major Health Risks: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS Medicine, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
357 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Distribution of Major Health Risks: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study
Published in
PLOS Medicine, October 2004
DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.0010027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 339 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 59 17%
Student > Master 44 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 12%
Professor 29 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 29 8%
Other 90 25%
Unknown 63 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 135 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 7%
Social Sciences 19 5%
Environmental Science 19 5%
Psychology 16 4%
Other 68 19%
Unknown 76 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2016.
All research outputs
#12,356,702
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#4,392
of 5,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,748
of 106,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#21
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 81.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.