↓ Skip to main content

Who defines “good” climate change adaptation and why it matters: a case study from Abaiang Island, Kiribati

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Environmental Change, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Who defines “good” climate change adaptation and why it matters: a case study from Abaiang Island, Kiribati
Published in
Regional Environmental Change, March 2020
DOI 10.1007/s10113-020-01614-9
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 38 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 21%
Environmental Science 13 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 43 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2025.
All research outputs
#3,190,164
of 32,442,164 outputs
Outputs from Regional Environmental Change
#302
of 1,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,513
of 411,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Environmental Change
#10
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,442,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.