↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Managing Chronic Cough as a Symptom in Children and Management Algorithms CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report
Published in
CHEST, March 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.chest.2020.01.042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne B. Chang, John J. Oppenheimer, Richard S. Irwin, CHEST Expert Cough Panel, Todd M. Adams, Kenneth W. Altman, Elie Azoulay, Fiona Blackhall, Surinder S. Birring, Donald C. Bolser, Louis-Philippe Boulet, Sidney S. Braman, Christopher Brightling, Priscilla Callahan-Lyon, Anne B. Chang, Terrie Cowley, Paul Davenport, Ali A. El Solh, Patricio Escalante, Stephen K. Field, Dina Fisher, Cynthia T. French, Cameron Grant, Susan M. Harding, Anthony Harnden, Adam T. Hill, Richard S. Irwin, Peter J. Kahrilas, Joanne Kavanagh, Karina A. Keogh, Kefang Lai, Andrew P. Lane, Craig Lilly, Kaiser Lim, Mark Lown, J. Mark Madison, Mark A. Malesker, Stuart Mazzone, Lorcan McGarvey, Alex Molasoitis, M. Hassan Murad, Mangala Narasimhan, John Oppenheimer, Richard J. Russell, Jay H. Ryu, Sonal Singh, Maeve P. Smith, Susan M. Tarlo, Anne E. Vertigan

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 219 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 20 9%
Researcher 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 93 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 104 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2026.
All research outputs
#1,112,569
of 34,437,553 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#748
of 18,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,631
of 420,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#19
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,437,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.