↓ Skip to main content

内陸アジアの傷身行為に関する一試論

Overview of attention for article published in Shigaku Zasshi, June 1984
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 516)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
内陸アジアの傷身行為に関する一試論
Published in
Shigaku Zasshi, June 1984
DOI 10.24471/shigaku.93.6_1041
Authors

谷 憲

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,685,227
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Shigaku Zasshi
#34
of 516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#919
of 8,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Shigaku Zasshi
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 516 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them