↓ Skip to main content

PM10-induced Hospital Admissions for Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
PM10-induced Hospital Admissions for Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published in
Epidemiology, July 2012
DOI 10.1097/ede.0b013e3182572563
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Evidence suggests that oxidative stress is a unifying feature underlying the toxic actions of particulate matter (PM). We have investigated whether individual plasma antioxidant concentrations (uric acid and vitamins C, A, and E) and 10 antioxidant genes modify the response to PM with respect to hospital admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 95 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Master 10 10%
Other 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 28%
Environmental Science 16 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 25 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,683,597
of 34,178,444 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiology
#650
of 3,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,685
of 211,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiology
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,178,444 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.