↓ Skip to main content

Quantum Dots

Overview of attention for book
Quantum Dots
Springer US

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Multivariate Optimization: A Powerful Tool for the Systematic Control of Quantum Dots Properties
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Absolute and Relative Methods for Fluorescence Quantum Yield Evaluation of Quantum Dots
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Preparation and Analysis of Quantum Dots: Applications of Capillary Electrophoresis
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Measuring the Hydrodynamic Radius of Colloidal Quantum Dots by Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Encapsulating Quantum Dots in Lipid–PEG Micelles and Subsequent Copper-Free Click Chemistry Bioconjugation
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Quantitative Analysis of Single Quantum Dot Trajectories
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Phase Transfer and DNA Functionalization of Quantum Dots Using an Easy-to-Prepare, Low-Cost Zwitterionic Polymer
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Dextran-Functionalized Quantum Dot Immunoconjugates for Cellular Imaging
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Labeling Neuronal Proteins with Quantum Dots for Single-Molecule Imaging
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Quantitative Chemical Delivery of Quantum Dots into the Cytosol of Cells
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Stimulus-Sensitive Theranostic Delivery Systems Based on Microcapsules Encoded with Quantum Dots and Magnetic Nanoparticles
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Resazurin-Based Assay to Evaluate Cell Viability After Quantum Dot Interaction
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Multiplexed Detection of Cancer Serum Antigens with a Quantum Dot-Based Lab-on-Bead System
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 CdS Quantum Dots Modified Photoelectrochemical Biosensor for TATA-Binding Protein Probing
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Quantum Dots-Based Lateral Flow Test Strip for Glutathione Detection
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Comparative Advantages and Limitations of Quantum Dots in Protein Array Applications
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Development of Optical Sensors Based on Quantum Dots Using Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for Determination of Prilocaine
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Detection of Tetanus Antibody Applying a Cu-Zn-In-S/ZnS Quantum Dot-Based Lateral Flow Immunoassay
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Quantum Dots for Assessment of Reactive Oxygen Species Accumulation During Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy
Attention for Chapter 19: Quantum Dots for Assessment of Reactive Oxygen Species Accumulation During Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Chapter title
Quantum Dots for Assessment of Reactive Oxygen Species Accumulation During Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy
Chapter number 19
Book title
Quantum Dots
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, April 2020
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-0463-2_19
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-160462-5, 978-1-07-160463-2
Authors

Kimal Honour Djam, Bong Han Lee, Sindhuja Suresh, Andrew Edet Ekpenyong, Djam, Kimal Honour, Lee, Bong Han, Suresh, Sindhuja, Ekpenyong, Andrew Edet

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Lecturer 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2020.
All research outputs
#22,795,449
of 34,187,362 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,644
of 19,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,602
of 427,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#28
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,187,362 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.