↓ Skip to main content

A joint SZ–X-ray–optical analysis of the dynamical state of 288 massive galaxy clusters

Overview of attention for article published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A joint SZ–X-ray–optical analysis of the dynamical state of 288 massive galaxy clusters
Published in
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, May 2020
DOI 10.1093/mnras/staa1157
Authors

A Zenteno, D Hernández-Lang, M Klein, C Vergara Cervantes, D L Hollowood, S Bhargava, A Palmese, V Strazzullo, A K Romer, J J Mohr, T Jeltema, A Saro, C Lidman, D Gruen, V Ojeda, A Katzenberger, M Aguena, S Allam, S Avila, M Bayliss, E Bertin, D Brooks, E Buckley-Geer, D L Burke, R Capasso, A Carnero Rosell, M Carrasco Kind, J Carretero, F J Castander, M Costanzi, L N da Costa, J De Vicente, S Desai, H T Diehl, P Doel, T F Eifler, A E Evrard, B Flaugher, B Floyd, P Fosalba, J Frieman, J García-Bellido, D W Gerdes, J R Gonzalez, R A Gruendl, J Gschwend, G Gutierrez, W G Hartley, S R Hinton, K Honscheid, D J James, K Kuehn, O Lahav, M Lima, M McDonald, M A G Maia, M March, P Melchior, F Menanteau, R Miquel, R L C Ogando, F Paz-Chinchón, A A Plazas, A Roodman, E S Rykoff, E Sanchez, V Scarpine, M Schubnell, S Serrano, I Sevilla-Noarbe, M Smith, M Soares-Santos, E Suchyta, M E C Swanson, G Tarle, D Thomas, T N Varga, A R Walker, R D Wilkinson

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 28 72%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,359,114
of 28,812,439 outputs
Outputs from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#13,413
of 41,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,871
of 420,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#403
of 884 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,812,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 884 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.