↓ Skip to main content

Fear of Predation Slows Plant-Litter Decomposition

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
431 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fear of Predation Slows Plant-Litter Decomposition
Published in
Science, June 2012
DOI 10.1126/science.1220097
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Aboveground consumers are believed to affect ecosystem functioning by regulating the quantity and quality of plant litter entering the soil. We uncovered a pathway whereby terrestrial predators regulate ecosystem processes via indirect control over soil community function. Grasshopper herbivores stressed by spider predators have a higher body carbon-to-nitrogen ratio than do grasshoppers raised without spiders. This change in elemental content does not slow grasshopper decomposition but perturbs belowground community function, decelerating the subsequent decomposition of plant litter. This legacy effect of predation on soil community function appears to be regulated by the amount of herbivore protein entering the soil.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 431 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 15 3%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 389 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 103 24%
Researcher 74 17%
Student > Master 61 14%
Student > Bachelor 37 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 24 6%
Other 76 18%
Unknown 56 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 237 55%
Environmental Science 83 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 <1%
Other 15 3%
Unknown 76 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2018.
All research outputs
#563,499
of 32,013,898 outputs
Outputs from Science
#12,806
of 91,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,395
of 204,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#55
of 830 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,013,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 830 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.