↓ Skip to main content

Depth-dependent soil mixing persists across climate zones

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Depth-dependent soil mixing persists across climate zones
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2020
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1914140117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harrison J. Gray, Amanda Keen-Zebert, David J. Furbish, Gregory E. Tucker, Shannon A. Mahan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 17 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 40%
Environmental Science 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 18 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,347,714
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#27,497
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,600
of 375,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#526
of 953 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 953 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.