You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Describing historical habitat use of a native fish—Cisco (Coregonus artedi)—in Lake Michigan between 1930 and 1932
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0231420 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yu-Chun Kao, David B. Bunnell, Randy L. Eshenroder, Devin N. Murray |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 62% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 46% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 22% |
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,179,099
of 25,046,311 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#51,523
of 217,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,860
of 377,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#757
of 2,781 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,046,311 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,781 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.