↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Programmed Death 1 Expression as a Marker for Immune and Physiological Dysfunction in the Critically Ill Surgical Patient
Published in
Shock, August 2012
DOI 10.1097/shk.0b013e31825de6a3
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Programmed death 1 (PD-1) is an inhibitor protein receptor for the immune system and has been shown to be upregulated in animal models of critical illness as well as after trauma and in burn victims in humans. It is believed that PD-1 may play a role in the immune dysfunction seen in surgical critical illness. However, although prior studies have associated changes in PD-1 expression with altered immune cell function, it is not known if a correlation with clinical status exists. We therefore aimed to describe a potential role for PD-1 in the immune dysfunction seen in critically ill trauma and surgical patients. This is an observational cohort study. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores were calculated on critically ill and injured trauma and surgical intensive care unit patients from a tertiary care/level I trauma center. Blood was drawn within 24 h of establishment of diagnosis and admission to the intensive care unit to measure circulating cytokine levels, as well as PD-1 expression on circulating cells. Main outcome measures included PD-1 expression on leukocytes and the relationship to physiological dysfunction (APACHE II) as well as the correlation of PD-1 expression and interleukin 10 levels among patients with severe physiological dysfunction. Samples were collected from 90 critically ill surgical patients. Among patients with severe physiological dysfunction (APACHE II >20), there were increased numbers of granulocytes (median, 144 vs. 90 cells/μL; P = 0.037) and monocytes (median, 12 vs. 6 cells/μL; P = 0.022) with PD-1 expression. In addition, among patients with an APACHE II score of greater than 20, there was a larger percentage of CD3 cells (44% vs. 29%; P = 0.015) expressing PD-1. When only patients with an APACHE II score greater than 20 were assessed, PD-1 expression on monocytes correlated positively with interleukin levels in the serum (r = 0.525, P = 0.05). Variability in the expression of PD-1 on leukocytes in critical surgical illness correlates with physiological dysfunction and suggests that PD-1 may be a valuable tool in the assessment of immune dysfunction following trauma or severe surgical insult.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Professor 3 8%
Librarian 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 15 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 17 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2016.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Shock
#2,010
of 3,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,270
of 179,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Shock
#14
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,259 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.