You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Toxic-Metal-Induced Alteration in miRNA Expression Profile as a Proposed Mechanism for Disease Development
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cells, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.3390/cells9040901 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David R. Wallace, Yasmeen M. Taalab, Sarah Heinze, Blanka Tariba Lovaković, Alica Pizent, Elisavet Renieri, Aristidis Tsatsakis, Ammad Ahmad Farooqi, Dragana Javorac, Milena Andjelkovic, Zorica Bulat, Biljana Antonijević, Aleksandra Buha Djordjevic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 17% |
Spain | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
Researcher | 12 | 13% |
Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 35 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 46 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,673,358
of 24,473,185 outputs
Outputs from Cells
#619
of 9,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,678
of 375,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cells
#47
of 563 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,473,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 563 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.