↓ Skip to main content

Natural versus commercial carbohydrate supplementation and endurance running performance

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
82 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Natural versus commercial carbohydrate supplementation and endurance running performance
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/1550-2783-9-27
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We examined the metabolic, performance and gastrointestinal (GI) effects of supplementation with a natural food product (raisins) compared to a commercial product (sport chews).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 23%
Student > Bachelor 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Professor 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 33 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 35 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 34 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2026.
All research outputs
#444,165
of 33,704,742 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#155
of 1,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,616
of 471,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#131
of 865 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,704,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 71.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 865 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.