↓ Skip to main content

Intergroup differences in the sharing of emotive states: neural evidence of an empathy gap

Overview of attention for article published in Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
reddit
5 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Intergroup differences in the sharing of emotive states: neural evidence of an empathy gap
Published in
Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, June 2011
DOI 10.1093/scan/nsr035
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Empathy facilitates prosocial behavior and social understanding. Here, however, we suggest that the most basic mechanism of empathy--the intuitive sharing of other's emotional and motivational states--is limited to those we like. Measuring electroencephalographic (EEG) alpha oscillations as people observed ingroup vs outgroup members, we found that participants showed similar activation patterns when feeling sad as when they observed ingroup members feeling sad. In contrast, participants did not show these same activation patterns when observing outgroup members and even less so the more they were prejudiced. These findings provide evidence from brain activity for an ingroup bias in empathy: empathy may be restricted to close others and, without active effort, may not extend to outgroups, potentially making them likely targets for prejudice and discrimination.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Spain 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 360 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 94 25%
Student > Master 50 13%
Student > Bachelor 48 13%
Researcher 38 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 56 15%
Unknown 67 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 176 46%
Social Sciences 36 9%
Neuroscience 25 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 3%
Other 46 12%
Unknown 75 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 140. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2026.
All research outputs
#375,199
of 34,394,092 outputs
Outputs from Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience
#82
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,203
of 166,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,394,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.