| Title |
Intergroup differences in the sharing of emotive states: neural evidence of an empathy gap
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1093/scan/nsr035 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
Empathy facilitates prosocial behavior and social understanding. Here, however, we suggest that the most basic mechanism of empathy--the intuitive sharing of other's emotional and motivational states--is limited to those we like. Measuring electroencephalographic (EEG) alpha oscillations as people observed ingroup vs outgroup members, we found that participants showed similar activation patterns when feeling sad as when they observed ingroup members feeling sad. In contrast, participants did not show these same activation patterns when observing outgroup members and even less so the more they were prejudiced. These findings provide evidence from brain activity for an ingroup bias in empathy: empathy may be restricted to close others and, without active effort, may not extend to outgroups, potentially making them likely targets for prejudice and discrimination. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Panama | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 100% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 360 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 94 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 13% |
| Researcher | 38 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 56 | 15% |
| Unknown | 67 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 176 | 46% |
| Social Sciences | 36 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 25 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 12% |
| Unknown | 75 | 20% |