You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Epigenetics: possible applications in climate-smart crop breeding
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Experimental Botany, April 2020
|
DOI | 10.1093/jxb/eraa188 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Serena Varotto, Eleni Tani, Eleni Abraham, Tamar Krugman, Aliki Kapazoglou, Rainer Melzer, Aleksandra Radanović, Dragana Miladinović |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 3 | 27% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
Ireland | 2 | 18% |
Peru | 1 | 9% |
Argentina | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 27% |
Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 152 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 32 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 17% |
Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 4% |
Other | 20 | 13% |
Unknown | 45 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 43% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 14% |
Engineering | 3 | 2% |
Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Unknown | 49 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,006,328
of 24,677,985 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Botany
#396
of 7,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,486
of 376,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Botany
#16
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,677,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.