↓ Skip to main content

Kinematic comparisons of 1996 Olympic baseball pitchers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Sports Sciences, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Kinematic comparisons of 1996 Olympic baseball pitchers
Published in
Journal of Sports Sciences, December 2010
DOI 10.1080/02640410152475793
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 105 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Master 13 12%
Other 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 27 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 24 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Engineering 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 35 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2020.
All research outputs
#15,604,607
of 23,201,298 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Sports Sciences
#3,164
of 3,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,340
of 182,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Sports Sciences
#41
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,201,298 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.