↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
guideline
8 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparative Effectiveness of Exercise Electrocardiography With or Without Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Women With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease
Published in
Circulation, August 2011
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.111.029660
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 191 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 12%
Other 21 11%
Researcher 21 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 53 27%
Unknown 44 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 56 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,443,700
of 29,858,747 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#3,733
of 26,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,436
of 143,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#17
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,858,747 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.