↓ Skip to main content

The Current Management of Idiopathic Clubfoot Revisited

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Current Management of Idiopathic Clubfoot Revisited
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, July 2012
DOI 10.1097/bpo.0b013e318259ff79
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In 2001, the members of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) were surveyed regarding their approach to treating idiopathic clubfoot deformity. Since that time, several studies have advocated a change in the approach to treating this deformity, moving away from surgical release and toward less invasive methods. The purpose of this study was to assess the recent approach to treating clubfoot among the POSNA membership.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 17%
Student > Master 7 15%
Other 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Linguistics 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2012.
All research outputs
#8,483,811
of 29,624,838 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
#391
of 2,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,325
of 186,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
#4
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,624,838 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,790 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.