↓ Skip to main content

Anaerobic oxalate degradation: widespread natural occurrence in aquatic sediments.

Overview of attention for article published in Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anaerobic oxalate degradation: widespread natural occurrence in aquatic sediments.
Published in
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 1983
DOI 10.1128/aem.46.1.106-113.1983
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard L. Smith, Ronald S. Oremland

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 35%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 12%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 1993.
All research outputs
#7,610,011
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
#7,491
of 17,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,291
of 8,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied and Environmental Microbiology
#15
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.