↓ Skip to main content

Pathogenesis and treatment of growing skull fractures

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Neurology, April 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 179)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pathogenesis and treatment of growing skull fractures
Published in
Surgical Neurology, April 1995
DOI 10.1016/0090-3019(95)80066-p
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Growing skull fractures are poorly understood complications of pediatric skull fractures. A retrospective review of skull fractures at our institution from 1980-1993 revealed 10 patients with growing skull fractures. The age at injury ranged from 1-144 months, with 9 of 10 patients being under one year of age. The etiology of these fractures included falls, motor vehicle accidents, and child abuse. On average, growth of the fracture was diagnosed 14 months after the initial injury. Six patients have had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with one demonstrating leptomeningeal cyst herniation, two having brain herniation, and three having both brain parenchyma and leptomeningeal cyst herniation. All patients had malacic cortex underlying the fracture, but there was no evidence of intracranial hypertension. Nine patients have undergone craniotomy with excision of granulation tissue and gliotic brain, dural repair, and cranioplasty using surrounding normal skull. There were no surgical complications or recurrences. Brain/leptomeningeal cyst herniation through a dural rent, without MRI evidence of increased intracranial pressure, implicates physiologic growth and brain cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pulsations as the cause of fracture enlargement.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Student > Master 6 16%
Researcher 6 16%
Other 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 43%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2020.
All research outputs
#9,515,460
of 27,778,980 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Neurology
#32
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,245
of 27,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Neurology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,778,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them