↓ Skip to main content

南極研究特別委員会 (SCAR) ・国際地学連合 (IUGS) 共催 : 南極地質シンポジウム

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi), November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
南極研究特別委員会 (SCAR) ・国際地学連合 (IUGS) 共催 : 南極地質シンポジウム
Published in
Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi), November 2009
DOI 10.5026/jgeography.72.258
Authors

立見 辰雄

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2020.
All research outputs
#21,048,638
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi)
#654
of 738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,486
of 108,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi)
#43
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.